Battlefield 1: Video Review
Much was expected from Battlefield 1: some hoped to see multiplayer in the best traditions of the series, others – a heartbreaking military drama, and still others – a merciless shooter with an emphasis on realism. From our video dispatch you will find out who got what they dreamed of.
Battlefield 1
Best comments
“By the way, if suddenly someone in the comments wants to object, saying: “Hey, come on, they play Battle for the sake of multiplayer.”.“No, comrades, it doesn’t work like that. We made a single, ripped off money for it, reap the benefits” © Konstantin Trostenyuk, Video results of 2013.
Amazing? There are so many small and big minuses in the game, but the score is the highest. It is obvious that the author is a fan of the series.
“Siege” and Overwatch the lack of a single, even a passable one, did not prevent them from receiving the highest rating. :) For example, I think that at one time it was a big mistake to rate BC2 “commendable” only because of the average campaign. I didn’t want to repeat it.
I wouldn’t say that CoD can be https://bookmakersnotongamstop.co.uk/review/gxmble/ a competitor, it’s a little different. Still, Boby Kitty doesn’t shout “Tactics-Tactics-Tactics” at every turn, which in my eyes makes Activision better than EA, after all, CoD is positioned as a chaotic and idiotic shooter about pink/golden guns, and that’s what it turns out to be. And in my purely personal opinion, comparing CoD with BF is the same as BF with Arma. Of course, if you very briefly learn about Battlefield, after playing Arma it may seem that the games are similar, but there hasn’t been anything close to BF for a long time.
https://youtu.be/nULp0pGKCS8
It’s just that for some reason it’s more important for many people to figure out the “correctness” of the picture at the end of the video than to pay attention to ten minutes before them. :) If this makes you feel better, I can explain once again that assessment is a purely subjective and largely emotional thing. I, like most in the BF community, have always given a damn about the BF single, but to those who care about it, I explained that it sucks. My attitude to this is simple – the game should not be evaluated according to the principle “for this 10, for that 5 – you get 7.5".
Yes, the problem here is that there are no competitors – nothing to compare with. And what could be compared with is not comparable in level.
This is the same Battlefield that was in 2015, 2013, 2011 with the interface from Battlefront.
And if they put a rotten multiplayer into an obviously single-player game like Tomb Raider or Dead Space 2, take that into account too?
In general, the locals determined that the assessment was again wrong. Konstantin, it looks like it’s time to disperse your entire sham, including yourself, and close the site. Well, or take local commentators into the expert commission, who will determine the rating before the review is published on the site. LOL
It looks like we need to completely remove the ratings in order to blazing fifths the conversations in the comments were about the review, and not about the plate at the end.
Hmmm I read the comments and I’m surprised. They rated it “amazingly” bad, they would have rated it “commendable” – the whining about the mafia began 3.
But I have no complaints about the rating, since the game is not interesting (I played enough in the 4th battle, look again at the same thing on new maps, meh… And my heart is occupied with Sidge). I’m talking about the fact itself. The game should evaluate all its components, the developers put some work into creating the single, and PR people also advertised it, which means it should be evaluated as well as its multiplayer component, and not according to the principle “well, I don’t play it, so Fuck it»
The question here is rather why they continue to try so hard to make this very plot, because players have clearly stopped being interested in it in their games a long time ago, they are putting in extra work.
Overwatch was initially designed for multiplayer, for the battle there was no need to make a single at all or do it without production, and then it would have been amazing, but the developers still gave birth to a single player campaign, which turned out to be no good, in total – the game deserves praise.

This Post Has 0 Comments